top of page
Search


What the Austin Project Really Does — and Why Public Comments Matter
The Forest Service released the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Austin Project on February 2. Because this project affects nearly 80,000 acres of public land in Eastern Oregon, Forest Access For All (FAFA) took the time to read the document carefully, review the maps, and compare what is written to what exists on the ground. What we found raises serious concerns about access, transparency, and whether the project stays within the emergency authority it rel
keepitopenfafa
Feb 173 min read


What Happened in 2018 — And Why It Matters Now
When we talk about the Blue Mountains Forest Plan revision today, we aren’t starting from scratch. We’ve been here before. In 2018, the first attempt to revise the forest plans for the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests was withdrawn. That didn’t happen quietly. And it didn’t happen by accident. It happened after significant public involvement raised serious concerns about process, analysis, and how community needs were reflected in the proposed directio
keepitopenfafa
Feb 123 min read


“Stored” Roads, Closed Access: The Austin Project and a Pattern of Public Misdirection
“Stored” Roads, Closed Access: The Austin Project and a Pattern of Public Misdirection
keepitopenfafa
Feb 54 min read


From Open Forests to Permission-Based Access: What This Revision Is Trying to Change
From Open Forests to Permission-Based Access: What This Revision Is Trying to Change
keepitopenfafa
Feb 33 min read
bottom of page
