top of page

Access Was Not Removed From the Plan. It Was Spread Out.

  • keepitopenfafa
  • Jun 23
  • 4 min read

The Blue Mountains Forest Plan DEIS has not been released yet, but we do not need to wait on the final document to start paying attention to one of the biggest issues in this process: access.


One of the easiest mistakes the public can make is to look for one clean section called "access," not find it, and assume the issue is not there anymore.


That would be wrong.


Access was not removed from the plan. It was redistributed into other plan components.

That may sound like a small paperwork change, but it matters. When an issue is gathered in one place, people can see it, follow it, and comment on it. When that same issue is spread across transportation, recreation, wildlife, roadless areas, waterways, scenery, wilderness, minerals, and other parts of the plan, it becomes harder for the public to track.

And if the public cannot track it, the public may not comment on it.


Why This Matters


The Forest Service is correct when it says a forest plan is not the same thing as travel management. A forest plan usually does not close a specific road, gate a specific trail, or decide whether you can drive to one exact campsite next Saturday.


But that does not mean the plan has no effect on access.


The forest plan sets the direction that future decisions will follow. It shapes the rules, priorities, and sideboards used later when the agency makes project-level decisions. Those later decisions can affect roads, trails, campgrounds, grazing access, firewood access, hunting access, timber work, and the ability of families to reach the places they have used for generations.


That is why the public cannot afford to ignore access just because it is not boxed up under one heading.


If a section on wildlife habitat pushes for less motorized disturbance, that can affect access.


If a section on riparian areas changes how roads near streams are handled, that can affect access.


If a section on recreation opportunity settings changes the desired experience for an area, that can affect access.


If a section on roadless areas, wilderness recommendations, scenery, or special designations changes the management direction for a place, that can affect access.


The word "access" may not be printed in bold letters on every page, but the effect can still show up on the ground

.

What People Need To Watch For


When the DEIS is released, Forest Access For All will be reviewing it closely. We will be looking for the plan language that could affect public access, even where that language is spread across several different sections.


We do not expect every person to sit down and read hundreds of pages of government documents on their own. That is part of why we are doing this work.


What we do need is for people to start thinking about the places, roads, trails, and uses that matter to them. Your local knowledge matters. You know where your family camps, where you cut firewood, where you hunt, where you gather, where livestock are moved, where access is already difficult, and where one more restriction would make a real difference.


When the DEIS comes out, we will be watching for plan language tied to:


  • roads and transportation systems;

  • motorized and non-motorized recreation;

  • recreation opportunity settings;

  • wildlife security or habitat disturbance;

  • riparian areas, streams, and road density;

  • roadless areas and wilderness recommendations;

  • scenery and quiet-use objectives;

  • grazing, timber, firewood, and forest-management access; and

  • minerals, permits, special uses, and traditional local uses.


Those are the places where access concerns may be hiding in plain sight.


Forest Access For All will help identify these issues, explain them in plain language, and provide tools to help people make stronger comments. But the comments still need your voice, your knowledge, and your connection to the ground.


A weak comment that only says “do not take our access” is easy for the agency to brush aside. A stronger comment explains what place you are talking about, what use is affected, what plan language or alternative raises the concern, and what you want the Forest Service to fix.


That is where we intend to help.


What The Forest Service Needs To Answer


The Forest Service should clearly explain how each alternative could affect public access, even where access is discussed under other resource headings.


The public should not have to guess whether access impacts are buried inside another section.


At a minimum, the DEIS should answer:


  • Where does the plan direction affect roads, trails, and practical access?

  • Which alternatives create more pressure to restrict or reduce motorized access later?

  • How will the agency protect access for hunting, gathering, grazing, timber, firewood, recreation, and emergency response?

  • How will local knowledge be used before future access decisions are made?

  • What safeguards will keep access from being reduced piece by piece without the public seeing the full picture?


Those are fair questions. They are not anti-forest. They are not anti-management. They are basic questions from people who live here, work here, and use these forests.


What You Can Do Now


Start making your access list before the DEIS comes out.


Write down the roads, trails, campsites, grazing areas, woodcutting areas, hunting access points, trailheads, and forest-work routes that matter to you. Note how you use them and what would happen if access became harder, more restricted, or less certain.


You do not need fancy language. You need facts and firsthand knowledge.


When the DEIS is released, Forest Access For All will help people connect that local knowledge to the plan language and submit stronger comments. We are also preparing a commenting tool to help you find the issue, understand the concern, and put your own words on the record.


For now, the job is simple:


Pay attention. Write down what matters. Follow Forest Access For All. Share this post with someone who uses the Blue Mountains national forests.


The DEIS is coming. Access needs to be on the record when it gets here.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page